| Year-on-year Highlights | |
| Fourth Quarter 2002 | Full Year 2002 |
| § Net profit increased 68.9% to S$282 million § Net profit excluding goodwill amortisation increased 49.8% to S$355 million | § Net profit increased 1.9% to S$1.017 billion § Net profit excluding goodwill amortisation increased 14.5% to S$1.295 billion |
| * * * | * * * |
| · Total income up 8.5% to S$1.048 billion § Operating expenses down 8.5% to S$471 million § Operating profit before goodwill amortisation and provisions up 28.0% to S$577 million § Provision charges up 108.2% to S$181 million § Non-performing loan (NPL) rate increased to 6.1% due partially to a lower non-bank loan base § Cost-to-income ratio down from 53.4% to 45.0% | § Total income increased 15.1% to S$4.066 billion § Operating expenses increased 7.0% to S$1.851 billion due to the full-year consolidation of Dao Heng Bank versus a half-year consolidation in 2001 § Operating expenses excluding acquisitions down 7.0% § Operating profit before goodwill amortisation and provisions increased 22.9% to S$2.215 billion § Provision charges up 41.0% to $534 million § Cost-to-income ratio down from 48.9% to 45.5% |
Full year 2002 resultsTotal income for the year ended December 31, 2002 rose 15.1% to S$4.066 billion. Compared to last year, net profit attributable to members was up 1.9% to S$1.017 billion. However, net profit attributable to members excluding goodwill amortisation was up 14.5% from the previous year to S$1.295 billion. Earnings per share for the year was S$0.68, and excluding goodwill amortisation was S$0.87.For the full year 2002, expenses increased by 7.0% with the full year consolidation of Dao Heng Bank and DBS Vickers Securities. Expenses in 2001 were lower because of the partial year consolidation of the two subsidiaries - Dao Heng Bank profit and loss was consolidated into DBS results from July 2001, and DBS Vickers Securities was consolidated from September, 2001. Excluding the effects of these acquisitions, expenses would have declined 7.0%. The cost-to-income ratio for the year improved from 48.9% in the previous year to 45.5%.
Operating profit before goodwill amortisation and provisions increased 22.9% to S$2.215 billion from S$1.803 billion a year ago. The year-on-year operating profit comparison is favourable even though 2002 operating profit was supported by the fourth quarter gain of S$96 million from the sale of NatSteel Ltd shares, as compared to the larger gain in 2001 of S$181 million for the sale of DBS' ownership in The Insurance Corporation of Singapore and the shares of Keppel Capital Holdings.
Fourth quarter 2002 resultsNet profit attributable to members was S$282 million, an increase of 68.9% compared to the fourth quarter of 2001. Excluding goodwill amortisation, net profit attributable to members for the quarter rose 49.8% to S$355 million.Total operating costs for the quarter were S$471 million, compared with S$516 million in the fourth quarter of 2001, a reduction of 8.5%. The improvement in expenses was primarily driven by the cost containment initiatives set in place in 2001.
Notwithstanding the improvement, expenses would have been lower if not for one-time charges that include a write-down of assets at DBS Kwong On Bank with the completed integration with Dao Heng Bank, a write-down of other assets, severance costs, and set-up costs related to the 10-year S$1.2 billion IT outsourcing alliance with IBM. The outsourcing contract is expected to help the Group achieve cost savings in future years. The cost-to-income ratio for the quarter decreased from 53.4% to 45.0%.Operating profit for the fourth quarter was S$577 million, up 28.0% compared to the fourth quarter of 2001. Net profit was boosted by the previously described NatSteel gain, but held back by S$181 million in provision charges, an 108.2% increase compared to a lower fourth quarter 2001 provision amount that included equity provision writebacks.
Net Interest Income Compared to the same period last year, net interest income in the fourth quarter of 2002 declined 9.2% to S$642 million. Margins were under pressure due to high rates of refinancing in home mortgages as a result of the intense price competition in Singapore. Additionally, there were more interest rate gapping opportunities during the previous year as noted in the fourth quarter of 2001. The net interest margin was 1.97%, down from 2.11% in the fourth quarter of 2001. For the full year, the net interest margin increased to 1.99% from 1.87% a year ago.
Customer loans declined by 11.0% during the year to S$60.709 billion. DBS refrained from the price-driven competition in home mortgage lending through most of the year. Only in the fourth quarter did DBS start to match rates in the Singapore housing mortgage market due to the potential for incremental revenues offered by the Housing Development Board (HDB) privatisation initiative.
Non-Interest IncomeFee and commission income for the quarter was S$191 million, compared with S$207 million in the fourth quarter of 2001, a reduction of 8.0%. Though stockbroking fees declined due to the weak markets, investment banking, trade, loan, deposit, and fund management fees remained stable.For the year, fee and commission income rose 27.3% to S$797 million. DBS sold S$4.5 billion of various wealth management products, issued over 100,000 new credit cards during the year to a total of over 1.4 million credit cards, grew the personal unsecured credit business by over 100,000 accounts to capture an estimated 20% market share, and closed some of the largest investment banking deals in the markets it operates in.For the quarter, other income, up 364.6% to S$203 million, was largely driven by DBS' foreign exchange, interest rate, and derivatives market making activities, as well as by the NatSteel gain. Excluding the NatSteel gain, other income would have grown 144.4% compared to the previous year.
Asset quality DBS' total non-performing loans at year end were S$4.224 billion, down 6.4% from S$4.512 billion at end of year 2001. However, the calculated ratio of non-performing loans to total non-bank loans at the end of 2002 was up to 6.1% from 5.7% at the end of 2001 because the total volume of non-bank loans declined for the period.
Although NPLs declined compared to the end of 2001, NPLs rose by S$69 million in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter of 2002. The overall grading of the NPLs remained satisfactory with 68% of NPLs classified as substandard and only 32% graded doubtful or loss. The credit quality of consumer loans, though good compared to the rest of the portfolio, was affected by the higher charge-off rates for credit cards in Hong Kong. The charge-off rate for the year 2002 of 11.6%, was lower than the 13.3% rate for the industry as reported by Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). Under the same calculation basis, Singapore charge-off rates for the year 2002 would have been 2.8%.Provisions were S$181 million in the quarter, compared to S$87 million in the same quarter in 2001, a period that had S$44 million in net writebacks for equities and properties. Of the total provisions in the fourth quarter 2002, S$121 million was for loans, S$18 million was for equities and S$36 million was for properties and other assets.
| Asset Quality Statistics | ||
| Fourth Quarter 2002 | Fourth Quarter 2001 | |
| NPLs (in S$ billion) | 4.224 | 4.512 |
| Non-bank loans | 60.709 | 68.208 |
| NPL ratio * | 6.1% | 5.7% |
| Substandard | 68% | 68% |
| Doubtful | 10% | 11% |
| Loss | 22% | 21% |
| Total Provision Charge (in S$ million) | 181 | 87 |
| Specific Provision Loans | 121 | 141 |
| Specific Provision Equities | 18 | (114) |
| Specific Provision - Properties and Other Assets | 36 | 70 |
| General Provision | 5 | (10) |
| December 31, 2002 | September 30, 2002 | |
| Hong Kong Credit Cards | ||
| Annualised Charge-off rate | 11.6% | 10.8% |
| 90-day Delinquency rate | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Singapore Credit Cards | ||
| Annualised Charge-off rate | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| 90-day Delinquency rate | 1.3% | 1.3% |
*Although NPLs include loans, debt securities and contingent facilities, the NPL ratio is calculated using non-performing non-bank loans divided by total non-bank loans. In the calculation of the ratio, the numerator and denominator excludes debt securities and contingent facilities. | ||