BASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

DBS Group Holdings Ltd and its subsidiaries (the Group) have adopted Basel II as set out in the revised Monetary Authority of Singapore Notice to Banks No. 637 (Notice on Risk Based Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks incorporated in Singapore or MAS Notice 637) with effect from 1 January 2008.

The Group views Basel II as part of continuing efforts to strengthen its risk management culture and ensure that the Group pursues business growth across segments and markets with the right risk management discipline, practices and processes in place.

The qualitative disclosures as required by MAS637 are presented in the Risk Management report on page 61 to page 68, the Capital Management and Planning report on page 69 and the Notes to the Financial Statements as referred to below. Disclosures on remuneration are presented in the Corporate Governance report on page 44 to page 60. The following information does not form part of the audited accounts.

1     SCOPE OF APPLICATION

The Group applies the Basel II Internal Ratings-Based Approach (IRBA) for computing part of its regulatory capital requirements for credit risk. Approved wholesale portfolios are on the Foundation IRBA, while the approved retail portfolios are on the Advanced IRBA. Most of the remaining credit exposures are on the Standardised Approach (SA) for credit risk. The Group also adopts the SA for operational and market risks.

The Group’s capital requirements are generally based on the principles of consolidation adopted in the preparation of its financial statements, as discussed in Note 2.2 to the Financial Statements, except where deductions from eligible capital are required under MAS Notice 637 or where entities meet separation requirements set by the MAS. Refer to Note 49 to the Financial Statements for the list of consolidated entities.

Top

2      CAPITAL ADEQUACY

The following table sets forth details on the capital resources and capital adequacy ratios for the Group as at 31 December 2011. The Group’s Tier 1 and total capital adequacy ratios as at 31 December 2011 were 12.9% and 15.8% respectively, which are above the MAS minimum requirements of 6.0% and 10.0%.

The constituents of total eligible capital are set out in MAS Notice 637 Part VI. These include shareholders’ funds after regulatory-related adjustments, minority interests, and eligible capital instruments issued by the Group. Refer to Notes 35 and 34 to the Financial Statements for the terms of these capital instruments, and Note 47 on the capital management policies and processes for the group.

   
in $ millions 2011
Tier 1 capital  
Share capital 9,350
Disclosed reserves 19,033
Paid-up non-cumulative preference shares 2,500
Minority interests 275
Innovative Tier 1 instruments 1,500
Less: Deductions from Tier 1 capital  
Goodwill and deferred tax assets 4,931
Other deductions (50%) 192
Eligible Tier 1 capital 27,535
Tier 2 capital  
Loan allowances admitted as Tier 2 1,151
Subordinated debts 5,305
Revaluation surplus from equity securities 29
Less: Deductions from Tier 2 capital  
Other deductions (50%) 192
Total eligible capital 33,828
Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA)  
Credit 174,833
Market 25,855
Operational 13,034
Total RWA 213,722
Tier 1 Capital Adequacy Ratio (%) 12.9
Total Capital Adequacy Ratio (%) 15.8

Significant Banking Subsidiary

DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited and its subsidiaries (a)

Tier 1 Capital Adequacy Ratio (%) (b) 12.2
Total Capital Adequacy Ratio (%) 14.5

(a) The capital adequacy ratios are compiled in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules issued by the
     Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) under Section 98A of the Hong Kong Banking Ordinance
(b) Core capital ratio under HKMA rules

   
in $ milions 2011 RWA
Credit Risk:  
IRBA  
Retail exposures  
Residential mortgage exposures 2,648
Qualifying revolving retail exposures 2,418
Other retail exposures 867
Wholesale exposures  
Sovereign exposures 3,711
Bank exposures 17,583
Corporate exposures 75,231
Corporate small business exposures (SME) 2,926
Specialised lending exposures (SL) 23,611
Equity 8,366
Securitisation 165
Total IRBA RWA 137,526
Adjusted IRBA RWA post scaling factor of 1.06 145,778
SA  
Residential mortgage exposures 1,173
Regulatory retail exposures 1,039
Corporate exposures 13,029
Commercial real estate exposures 1,192
Other exposures  
Real estate, premises, equipment and other fixed assets 1,347
Exposures to individuals 7,543
Others 3,732
Total SA RWA 29,055
Total credit risk 174,833
Market risk:  
SA  
Interest rate risk 18,804
Equity position risk 118
Foreign exchange risk 6,925
Commodity risk 8
Total RWA for market risk 25,855
Operational risk (SA) 13,034
Total RWA 213,722

Top

3      CREDIT RISK

3.1   SUMMARY OF CREDIT EXPOSURES(a)

   
In $ millions 2011 Exposures
Advanced IRBA  
Retail exposures  
Residential mortgage exposures 44,492
Qualifying revolving retail exposures 9,952
Other retail exposures 3,242
Foundation IRBA  
Wholesale exposures  
Sovereign exposures 48,762
Bank exposures 66,428
Corporate exposures 121,280
Corporate small business exposures 4,245
Specialised lending exposures 23,697
IRBA for equity exposures 2,527
IRBA for securitisation exposures 348
Total IRBA 324,973
SA  
Residential mortgage exposures 3,351
Regulatory retail exposures 1,372
Corporate exposures 13,082
Commercial real estate exposures 1,190
Other exposures  
Real estate, premises, equipment and other fixed assets 1,347
Exposures to individuals 7,533
Others 7,262
Total SA 35,137
Total 360,110

(a)

Amounts represent exposures after credit risk mitigation and where applicable include on-balance sheet amounts and credit equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet items determined in accordance with MAS Notice 637

Refer to Notes 19 to 21, 38, 44.1 and 46 for major types of credit exposures by geographic location and industry distribution, analysis of maximum exposures to credit risk and credit exposures by residual contractual maturity distribution.

Top

3.2   CREDIT RISK ASSESSED USING INTERNAL RATINGS –
         BASED APPROACH

3.2.1  RETAIL EXPOSURES

(A) Residential mortgage exposures

Expected Loss (EL) % range Exposures(a)
(In $ millions)
Exposure-weighted
average risk
weight(b)
(%)
Up to 0.10% 42,857 5
> 0.10% to 0.50% 1,266 32
> 0.50% 369 60
Total 44,492 6

(a)

Includes undrawn commitments set out in table(D) below

(b)

Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor and exclude default exposures

(B) Qualifying revolving retail exposures

EL % range Exposures(a)
(In $ millions)
Exposure-weighted
average risk
weight(b)
(%)
Up to 5% 9,467 17
> 5% 485 176
Total 9,952 24

(a)

Includes undrawn commitments set out in table(D) below

(b)

Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor and exclude default exposures

(C) Other retail exposures

EL % range Exposures
(In $ millions)
Exposure-weighted
average risk
weight(a)
(%)
Up to 0.30% 2,167 17
> 0.30% 1,075 47
Total 3,242 27

(a) Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor and exclude defaulted exposures

(D) Undrawn commitments for retail exposures

In $ millions Notional
amount
Credit
equivalent
amount(a)
Residential mortgage exposures 7,118 7,118
Qualifying revolving retail exposures 11,465 8,314
Total 18,583 15,432

(a)

Credit equivalent amount represents notional amounts multiplied by the applicable credit conversion factors

3.2.2  WHOLESALE EXPOSURES

(A) Sovereign exposures

PD grade PD range
(%)
Exposures
(In $ millions)
Exposure-
weighted
average
risk weight(a)
(%)
PD grade 1-3 0.00 – 0.10 46,534 6
PD grade 4A/4B 0.10 – 0.33 10 25
PD grade 5 0.33 – 0.47 1,720 37
PD grade 6A/6B 0.47 – 1.11 477 64
PD grade 7A-9 1.11 – 99.99 21 93
Total   48,762 8

(a)

Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor

(B) Bank exposures

PD grade PD range
(%)
Exposures
(In $ millions)
Exposure-
weighted
average
risk weight(a)
(%)
PD grade 1-3 0.03(b) – 0.10 33,179 10
PD grade 4A/4B 0.10 – 0.33 17,017 31
PD grade 5 0.33 – 0.47 7,555 41
PD grade 6A/6B 0.47 – 1.11 5,900 56
PD grade 7A-9 1.11 – 99.99 2,777 86
Total   66,428 26

(a)

Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor

(b)

For bank exposures, the PD is the greater of the one-year PD associated with the internal borrower grade to which that exposure is assigned, or 0.03% as specified in MAS Notice 637

(C) Corporate exposures

PD grade PD range
(%)
Exposures
(In $ millions)
Exposure-
weighted
average
risk weight(a)
(%)
PD grade 1-3 0.03(b) – 0.10 22,457 18
PD grade 4A/4B 0.10 – 0.33 19,029 45
PD grade 5 0.33 – 0.47 19,008 53
PD grade 6A/6B 0.47 – 1.11 27,741 73
PD grade 7A-9 1.11 – 99.99 31,164 104
PD grade 10 Default 1,881
Total   121,280 63(c)

(a)

Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor

(b)

For corporate exposures, the PD is the greater of the one-year PD associated with the internal borrower grade to which that exposure is assigned, or 0.03% as specified in MAS Notice 637

(c)

Excludes defaulted exposures

(D) Corporate small business(a) exposures

PD grade PD range
(%)
Exposures
(In $ millions)
Exposure-
weighted
average
risk weight(b)
(%)
PD grade 1-3 0.03(c) – 0.10
PD grade 4A/4B 0.10 – 0.33 9 35
PD grade 5 0.33 – 0.47 588 9
PD grade 6A/6B 0.47 – 1.11 1,278 49
PD grade 7A-9 1.11 – 99.99 2,317 97
PD grade 10 Default 53
Total   4,245 70(d)

(a)

SME refers to corporations with reported annual sales of less than S$100 million as defined under MAS Notice 637

(b)

Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor

(c)

For SME exposures, the PD is the greater of the one-year PD associated with the internal borrower grade to which that exposure is assigned, or 0.03% as specified in MAS Notice 637

(d)

Excludes defaulted exposures

3.2.3  SPECIALISED LENDING EXPOSURES

2011 RWA
(In $ millions)
Exposures
(In $ millions)
Exposure-
weighted
average
risk weight(a)
(%)
Strong 4,774 8,119 59
Good 7,360 8,837 83
Satisfactory 4,549 3,955 115
Weak 6,928 2,771 250
Default 0 15 0
Total 23,611 23,697 100(b)

(a)

Percentages disclosed are before the application of applicable IRBA scaling factor

(b)

Excludes defaulted exposures

3.2.4  SECURITISATION EXPOSURES

The Group does not securitise its own assets, nor does it acquire assets with a view to securitising them. The Group does not provide implicit support for any transactions it structures or in which it has invested. RWA and deductions incorporate implementation of Basel II.5 per MAS Notice 637 effective 31 Dec 2011.

All banking book assets are held at cost, less impairment allowances while all positions in trading book are fair valued though profit and loss. Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements on the Group’s accounting policy.

Securitisations for clients

The Group arranges securitisations for clients and earns fees for arranging such transactions and placing the securities issued into the market. These transactions do not involve SPEs that are controlled by the Group. For transactions that are not underwritten, no securitisation exposures are assumed as a direct consequence of arranging the transactions. Any decision to invest in such arranged transaction will be subject to independent risk assessment (see below). Where the Group provides an underwriting commitment, any securitisation exposure arising will be held in the trading book to be traded or sold down in accordance with internal policy and risk limits.

Exposures to client asset-backed securitisations

The Group invests in clients’ securitisation transactions from time to time, and this may include securitisation transactions arranged by either the Group or by other parties. The Group may also act as liquidity facility provider, working capital facility provider or swap counterparty. Subject to MAS Notice 637 paragraph 7.1.11, securitisation exposures in the banking book are risk weighted using the Ratings-Based Method or included in deductions from Tier 1 and Tier 2 Capital. Such exposures require the approval of the independent risk function prior to being assumed and are subject to regular risk review thereafter, taking into account the underlying risk characteristics of the assets.

Investment in collateralised debt obligations and asset-backed securitisations

The Group continues to hold certain investments in collateralised debt obligations and asset-backed securitisations that were made before 2008. Allowances for credit losses have been made for the total exposures arising from investments in CDOs. The remaining exposures are reviewed regularly by the independent risk function. To determine the capital requirements, the ratings-based method is used for banking book exposures and the standardised approach is used for trading book exposures.

Structured credit trading

Prior to 2008, the Group structured CDO notes. The Group was a credit default swap (CDS) counterparty to the issuing entity of the notes. Positions arising from this role were hedged with tranched credit index CDS with external counterparties. These positions are classified as securitisation exposures under MAS Notice 637. They are held in the trading book and the standardised approach is used to determine the capital requirements. The credit and market risks arising from these transactions are subject to risk limits. A substantial proportion of these exposures matured during 2011.

The table below sets out the banking book securitisation exposures (net of specific allowances) held by the Group, analysed by risk weights and exposure type:

2011 In $ millions Total Exposures Exposures
Risk-Weighted
RWA Deductions from Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital
Risk weights
On-balance sheet (a)
0% – 29%
Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) 85 85 17
Residential Mortgage-
Backed Securities (RMBS)
9 9 1
30% – 100%
Commercial Mortgage-
Backed Securities
(CMBS) & Others
165 165 116
Deducted
Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) 4 4
ABS collateralised debt/
loan obligations
(CDO) & Others (b)
40 40
Sub-total 303 259 134 44
Off-balance sheet
30% – 100%
Interest rate & cross
currency swaps with
securitisation vehicle
45 45 31
Total 348 304 165 44

(a) Includes undrawn commitment
(b) Includes resecuritisation exposures amounting to $40m

The table below sets out the trading book securitisation exposures held by the Group, analysed by risk weights and exposure type:

2011 In $ millions Total Exposures Exposures subject to Specific Risk capital requirement RWA Deductions from Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital
Risk weights
On-balance sheet
0% – 29%
Residential Mortgage-
Backed Securities (RMBS)
75 75 24
30% – 100%
Asset-Backed
Securities (ABS)
5 5 19
Sub-total 80 80 43
Off-balance sheet
30% – 100%
Tranched Credit
Index CDS
13 13 80
Deducted
Tranched Credit
Index CDS
194 194
Sub-total 207 13 80 194
Total 287 93 123 194

The Group did not enter into any sale of securitisation exposures during the year. The Group did not obtain credit risk mitigants and guarantees for its resecuritisation exposures.

3.2.5  PROVISIONING POLICIES FOR PAST DUE AND
           IMPAIRED EXPOSURES

Refer to the Notes to the Financial Statements listed in the following table for the Group’s provisioning policies in relation to past due and impaired exposures.

Note to the
Financial
Statements
Financial Disclosures
2.8 The Group’s accounting policies on the assessment of specific and general allowances on financial assets
44.2 Classified loans and past due loans by geographic and industry distribution
13, 20, 21 and 32 Movements in specific and general allowances during the year for the Group

3.2.6 COMPARISON OF EXPECTED LOSS AGAINST ACTUAL LOSSES

The following table sets out actual loss incurred in 2011 compared with EL reported for certain IRBA asset classes at December 2010. Actual loss refers to specific impairment loss allowance and charge-offs to the Group’s income statement during the financial year ended 31 December 2011.

Basel Asset Class 2010
Expected Loss
In $ millions
2011
Actual Loss
In $ millions
Wholesale Exposures
Sovereign exposures 6
Bank exposures 42
Corporate exposures (including SME & SL) 937 170
Retail Exposures
Residential mortgage exposures 17 #
Qualifying revolving retail exposures 103 21
Other retail exposures 13 2

# amount below $0.5m

EL is a Basel II measure of expected future losses based on Internal Ratings-Based models where PD grades are more through-the-cycle and LGD estimates are on a downturn basis, floored by regulatory minimums for retail exposures and based on supervisory estimates for wholesale exposures. Actual Loss is an accounting construct which includes net impairment allowances for non-defaulting accounts at the onset of the financial year and includes write-offs during the year. The two measures of losses are therefore not directly comparable and it is not appropriate to use Actual Loss data to assess the performance of internal rating process or to undertake comparative trend analysis.

Top

3.3   CREDIT RISK ASSESSED USING STANDARDISED APPROACH

The following table shows the exposures under SA, analysed by risk weights:

In $ millions Exposures
Risk Weights
0% 2,796
20% 321
35% 3,350
50% 1,153
75% 1,358
100% 26,040
>100% 119
Total 35,137

Top

3.4   CREDIT RISK MITIGATION

The following table summarises the extent to which credit exposures are covered by eligible financial collateral, other eligible collateral and eligible credit protection after the application of haircuts:

2011
In $ millions
Eligible
financial
collateral
Other
financial
collateral
Amount by
which credit
exposure
have been
reduced by
eligible credit
protection
Foundation IRBA
Wholesale exposures
Sovereign exposures 1,044 6
Bank exposures 3,338 1 29
Corporate exposures 5,336 5,969 3,855
Corporate SME 1,182 1,330 119
Sub-total 10,900 7,300 4,009
SA
Residential mortgage exposures 334
Regulatory retail exposures 134 1
Commercial real estate exposures 17
Corporate/other exposures 6,416 1,375
Sub-total 6,901 1,376
Total 17,801 7,300 5,385

The above table excludes exposures where collateral has been taken into account directly in the risk weights, such as the specialised lending and residential mortgage exposures. It also excludes exposures where the collateral, while generally considered as eligible under Basel II, does not meet the required legal/ operational standards e.g. in the case of legal enforcement uncertainty in specific jurisdictions. Certain exposures where the collateral is eligible under Foundation IRBA and not under SA have also been excluded for portfolios where the SA is applied e.g. exposures collateralised by commercial properties.

Top

3.5   COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK-RELATED EXPOSURES

3.5.1  NOTIONAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS OF CREDIT DERIVATIVES

  Notional of Credit Derivatives
In $ millions Protection
Bough
Protection
Sold
Own Credit Portfolio 39,914 38,202
Client Intermediation Activities 8,443 8,197
Total 48,357 46,399
Credit default swaps 48,334 46,399
Total return swaps 23
Total 48,357 46,399

Notional values of credit derivatives do not accurately reflect their economic risks. They comprise both beneficiary and guarantor (buy and sell protection) positions.

The Group generally has higher total notional amounts of protection bought than sold as credit derivatives are also used to hedge risks from other instruments, including those from customer flows. The protection sold in credit derivatives are largely matched with the protection bought through other credit derivatives or structured notes issued.

The Group actively monitors its counterparty credit risk in credit derivative contracts. More than 95% of the notional value of the Group’s credit derivative positions as at 31 December 2011 is to 15 large, established names with which the Group maintains collateral agreements.

3.5.2  CREDIT EQUIVALENT AMOUNTS FOR COUNTERPARTY EXPOSURES

   
In $ millions 2011
Replacement cost 20,797
Potential future exposure 18,093
Gross credit equivalent amount 38,890
Comprising:
Interest rate contract 11,808
Credit derivative contracts 6,977
Equity contracts 109
Foreign exchange contracts and gold 19,964
Commodities contracts 32
Gross credit equivalent amount 38,890
Less: Effect of netting arrangement 18,902
Credit equivalent amount after netting 19,988
Less: Collateral amount
Eligible financial collateral 863
Other eligible collateral 11
Net credit equivalent amount 19,114

Counterparty credit exposure is mitigated by exposure netting through ISDA agreements and recognition of eligible collateral, effects of which have been included in regulatory capital calculations where appropriate.

Top

4      EQUITY EXPOSURES IN BANKING BOOK

4.1   SCOPE OF APPLICATION

The Group’s banking book equity investments consist of:

•   Investments held for yield and/or long-term capital gains;
•   Strategic stakes in entities held as part of growth initiatives and/or
    in support of business operations.

The Group’s banking book equity investments are classified and measured in accordance with Financial Reporting Standards and are categorised as either AFS investments or Investments in Associates. Refer to Notes 2.2 and 2.7 to the Financial Statements for the Group’s accounting policies. Entities in which the Group holds significant interests are disclosed in Note 49 to the Financial Statements.

4.2   CAPITAL TREATMENT

The Group has adopted the IRBA simple risk weight method to calculate regulatory capital for equity exposures in its banking book.

The following tables summarise the Group’s equity exposures in the banking book, including investments in Tier 1 capital instruments of financial institutions:

2011
In $ millions
Total
exposures
Exposures
risk-
weighting
Deductions
from
Tier 1 or
Tier 2
Capital
Risk weights
300% 1,195 1,195
400% 1,195 1,195
Deducted 137 137
Total 2,527 2,390 137
2011 Exposures
risk-weighting
(in $ millions)
Exposure-
weighted
average risk
weight(a)
(%)
Major stake companies approved under
section 32 of the Banking Act 819 326
Capital investments
in financial institutions incorporated in Singapore, approved, licensed, registered or otherwise regulated by the Authority <= 2% of Eligible
Total Capital 32 300
Other equity exposures 1,539 364
Total 2,390 350

(a) Percentages disclosed are before the application of IRBA scaling factor

Details of the Group’s investments in AFS securities and Associates are set out in Notes 21 and 25 to the Financial Statements respectively while realised gains arising from sale and liquidation of equity exposures are set out in Note 9 to the Financial Statement.

The amount of unrealised gains for equity that have not been reflected in the Group’s income statement, but have been included in Tier 2 Capital is $29 million.

Top